On Jun 12, 8:56 am, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I suspect that if I saw a working patch I might lean a
> bit more towards +0, but it's pretty low on my radar.
Ok, I attached a patch. The funny thing is that that use-case sounded
good but it won't work due to how {% for %} works - it discards
additions to the context between loops.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
