yeah that is not really a nice way to do it, but the only possible one
currently.
We were discussing this issue a lot here, and have not come up with a
final nice syntax yet either, since there are a couple issues that
come up, but they just come up when you run into them :-)
On 6/14/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 05:36 -0700, alain D. wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > I would be happy to know you're impressions about the above
> > explanation ... if I made my point clear or not, or if you have any
> > objection why this would not be a useful feature ...
>
> I understood your point. I haven't had time to think about it fully yet.
> My gut feeling is that I don't like your proposed syntax -- there's
> probably something a closer to what we already have that can be used
> (perhaps a variation on the "noop" argument to {% trans %}). The idea is
> not to force people to have to reach for teh instruction manual
> everytime they need to use it.
>
> It will be a little while before I can get back to this
>
> Regards,
> Malcolm
>
>
>
> >
>
--
cu
Wolfram
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
