On Jul 5, 12:48 pm, anna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just in case anyone knows, is it the same with the other frameworks
> for Python, like Pylons, Turbogears, etc? I'm thinking yes, based on
> your answers here, but just wondering.
>
As someone coming to Django from TurboGears, I can say that TurboGears
tends to develop for one version of Python and then add support for
other versions as lesser supported afterthoughts.
It was originally developed for Python 2.4. When the topic of 2.3
support came up on the mailing list, the lead developers initial
response was "Hasn't everyone upgraded to 2.4?" It now has support
for 2.3, but it's really not tier one support, as TG makes such heavy
use of decorators.
Python 2.5 is now officially supported, but that is a recent
development.
As I have many clients on CentOS/RHEL, Django's equal treatment of
2.3, 2.4, and 2.5 is *greatly* appreciated.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
