Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 09:20 +0200, Gábor Farkas wrote: >> hi, > >> i'm always using the "pythonic" way (import the view function, and give >> it to the urlconf), and assumed that this is the recommended way. >> >> but what always worried me is that you still have to enter that >> "string-prefix", which is of course an empty-string in my case, but >> still, it's quite ugly there. > > If that was really a problem for you, then (a) you don't have enough > problems to worry about,
i have bigger problems to worry about, like http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/4789 :) but to the point: my argument was: IF the preferred way is to use callables, THEN having the string-prefix there is ugly. i hope you agree with that. so, i asked if django will keep the string-based urlconfs forever, or they will slowly become obsolete etc.. now i got the answer that they will stay, so the string-prefix is ok in that case. i understand that it might not be clear from my mail... btw. isn't django for *perfectionists* with deadlines? ... :-) thanks, gabor --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
