On 7/23/07, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/22/07, Amit Upadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have just uploaded a patch for what I call "reverse pagination".
> Please
> > read about it here:
> > http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/4956. You can see it
> > in action on my blog: http://www.amitu.com/blog/.
> [...]
> > To avoid confusion I was wondering if reverse pagination should be made
> default.
>
> This assumes pagination is always done on date-sorted items; there are
> plenty of other uses for pagination (e.g., splitting up a very long
> list of books, sorted alphabetically by title).  I *really* wouldn't
> want to wonder why my books are suddenly going Z-A when my default
> sorting is A-Z.


Ordering of objects do not change. User would not see any difference other
than the fact that page 1 contains items from 1-10 instead of latest item to
latest - 10 items [assuming paginate_by = 10].


-- 
Amit Upadhyay
Vakow! www.vakow.com
+91-9820-295-512

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to