oggie rob wrote: > - Application "Santa Cruz" built with 0.91 using psycopg1. Running > for just under a couple of years and accessed regularly. > - Application "Curriculum" built with trunk using psycopg1. Added > about 2 weeks ago & accessed infrequently.
> Are you sure this would happen? If that were the case I would have > expected my box to blow up by now. I wonder if the extensions are > named differently, or if the namespace avoids the problem (i.e. > "import psycopg" vs "import psycopg2")? I haven't seen any problems so > far (cross fingers). "Curriculum" use psycopg1 or 2? seems like that was part of your point. Carl K --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
