On Aug 17, 12:00 pm, Gary Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I do not like the idea of adding a new order_by parameter > either. However, there is a bit of an issue involving the > archive_index view though because it also uses a num_latest parameter, > IMHO implying that the items will be sorted by date_field descending.
Hm. Since archive_index is explicitly meant to provide the latest objects, I could see keeping the order_by in that view, and making it clear in the docs that it'll override any ordering you try to do on the QuerySet before having to the view. But archive_year should drop its explicit ordering for consistency with the other generic views. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---