Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > I'm not sure where you got the idea that automatic introspection is > the issue - the proposal I put forward included automatic > introspection. The issue has always been the aka syntax, and the > consequences of that syntax on the overall design.
because several of the complaints you've and others have listed would apply to any automatic introspection implementation. (most memorably the 'round-trip-change' data issue) but if i'm mistaken i apologize. btw, i must have missed your proposal. (unless you're referring to your 8/4/2007 email?) link? > Derek - on a housekeeping issue - are you happy for us to write-lock > the schema-evolution branches and close the outstanding tickets in > Django's ticket database relating to that branch? if you don't mind, i'd prefer you keep them open, lest as you suggest we get sudden fame and fortune and merging re-enters the realm of distant feasibility. :) (maintaining should be pretty easy anyway, once the majority of it is separated. i'll make that call once we release, i'm just not ready to commit to it yet) derek --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
