Etienne Robillard wrote: > > > On Nov 30, 2007 2:27 AM, Max Battcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > On Nov 30, 2007 2:18 AM, jj <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > move 0.96 to 1.0 status. This might sound somewhat artificial, but > > would clearly indicate that 0.96 is a version one can already trust. > > Isn't the Web site already advocating 0.96 that way? > > That might be a good idea... backport any remaining useful fixes to > 0.96, maybe go ahead and do the newforms -> forms rename, and not much > more really needs to be done and call that 1.0 and everything else > becomes 2.0... > > > I think it would be great if Django-1.0 (and subsequent releases) be > backward-compatible with Django-0.96...
I think it's fair to say that with the changes already in the trunk, this is a lost cause. gav --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
