On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 20:44 -0800, SmileyChris wrote: > I tried actually using lazy today for something and couldn't get it to > work. > It seems to me that the current implementation is basically broken. > > For example, I was trying to do lazy(my_function, list) > __proxy__.__init__ tries to setattr(self, k, [promise]), but that > won't actually work for any magic methods, because they need to be > class methods. > > After hacking around with it a bit and moving that code outside > __init__, I got it to work. > > Once it is working, it makes __repr__ work properly on lazy objects > too (which probably is the solution to that problem I was having with > some new tests returning <django.utils.functional.__proxy__ object at > 0x...>)! > > In fact, the only easy way to tell that it isn't actually that object > type is to test is_instance() > > Has anyone else actually tried using this method before?
What method? Malcolm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
