Hey Adrian -- I haven't had time to fully think through your idea -- there's something about it that rubs me the wrong way, but I can't put my finger on it -- but I do have one question/idea:
On 12/5/07, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This could be fully backwards-compatible. If INSTALLED_APPS is a > tuple/list of strings, then we convert it to an AppCollection > automatically. Would you be OK letting this be some sort of a mixed-content thing? I think it would go a long way towards making the change less disruptive if INSTALLED_APPS was still a list but allowed objects in it:: INSTALLED_APPS = [ 'some.app', app('django.contrib.admin', verbose_name="Admin") ] I'll try to figure out what about AppCollection makes me uncomfortable and get back to you... Jacob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---