Hey Adrian --

I haven't had time to fully think through your idea -- there's
something about it that rubs me the wrong way, but I can't put my
finger on it -- but I do have one question/idea:

On 12/5/07, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This could be fully backwards-compatible. If INSTALLED_APPS is a
> tuple/list of strings, then we convert it to an AppCollection
> automatically.

Would you be OK letting this be some sort of a mixed-content thing? I
think it would go a long way towards making the change less disruptive
if INSTALLED_APPS was still a list but allowed objects in it::

    INSTALLED_APPS = [
        'some.app',
        app('django.contrib.admin', verbose_name="Admin")
    ]

I'll try to figure out what about AppCollection makes me uncomfortable
and get back to you...

Jacob

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to