El jue, 24-01-2008 a las 20:16 +0900, Russell Keith-Magee escribió: > Thanks for taking the lead on this. Suggestions on how to improve > documentation are always welcome, especially when they are specific > suggestions, backed up by evidence of the existing inadequacy (as you > have done with ticket #6320) and a first draft.
Thanks!
> [...] Giving a role a specific label distinct from the community as a whole
> implies that some form of selection criteria will exist. [...] at least some
> of the confusion [...] is to do with the issue of how someone gets
> selected as a triager. [...] it would have just lead to the question "How do
> I get selected as a community triager?".
> [...] I would suggest that a better way to approach this
> issue would be to keep the existing core + triager labels.
I think SmileyChris comment was on the same direction, so I've just
attached a new draft on #6320. It removes the third role while inviting
everybody to help out at triaging and giving the points on what they/we
should and should not do.
There's a sentence I'm not sure about (on how it sounds):
"In fact, the only difference between you and a triager[...]"
The "you" could also be written as "a community member" or "a volunteer"
but I thought "you" could emphatize that if 'you' are reading 'this' you
can help with 'that'.
Anyway, Draft 2 published!
--
http://www.marcfargas.com -- will be finished some day.
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
