On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Collin Grady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To keep things consistent though, you'd then likely have to change normal > access > to work like that as well, so instead of foo.bar to look up the key "bar" > you'd > have to change it to use foo["bar"], which would be backwards incompatible - > otherwise you'd end up with two syntaxes for the same action, just one being > a > variable and the other a string.
Why do I have a sudden fear that a branch is going to spawn called "newtemplates"? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
