Whoops.. I missed this a couple of days ago. I think I lost
consciousness somewhere in the Py3k thread when catching up after the
weekend.
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 20:45 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> On 31/03/2008, at 2:33 AM, mtrier wrote:
[...]
> This is the behavior I'm seeing
> > on Queryset Refactor branch and to me it seems like it is not the
> > correct behavior.
[...]
> >>>> Category.objects.values('name', 'id')
> > [{'name': u'Algol', 'id': 1}, {'name': u'Smalltalk', 'id': 2},
> > {'name': u'PHP', 'id': 3}, {'name': u'CSharp', 'id': 4}]
> >>>> Category.objects.values('name').values('id')
> > [{'name': u'Algol'}, {'name': u'Smalltalk'}, {'name': u'PHP'},
> > {'name': u'CSharp'}]
> >
> > It would seem to me that the last query should return the same thing
> > as the prior one.
>
> Agreed. This looks like a bug to me; at a guess, the problem will be
> that when ValuesQuerySet is cloned, it doesn't copy the attribute list.
>
> It may be worth checking if this is still a problem with queryset-
> refactor; if it is stil a problem, it might be better to fix the
> problem there, rather than trunk.
Michael's using the branch (see the first quoted section).
It's a bug. I'll fix it.
Malcolm
--
If you think nobody cares, try missing a couple of payments.
http://www.pointy-stick.com/blog/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
