On May 17, 10:57 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There's a similar ticket to this at 7154 (http:// > > code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7154). It has a patch that works but I > > am not sure if it is the most elegant method. > > Whoops! Sounds like we're talking about the same thing. I thought > based on the summary that it was a different problem, because the > manager actually _does_ get copied over, but it just needs a slight > modification. > > I do tend to like the implementation on that ticket better, as it gets > closer to the root of the problem. Are there any disagreements about > whether that patch should be applied?
I do not know if there are any disagreements (I found qsrf very complicated to understand) but I am using the patch for the newcomments project. There are a couple of other quirks with Abstract Models which I was assured were trivial and would be done with the nfa merge. -- Cheers Thejaswi Puthraya http://thejaswi.info/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
