> Shouldn't this be marked as somewhat blocking for 1.0-alpha? Personally I would remove XmlField from the standard-models and create something like django.contrib.xml, which includes some common code for xml-handling (forms, models, dom/etree/..., xslt with callbacks, etc). But thats nothing I decide.
> Is there > any good reason why the code you wrote has not been accepted? #3094 is accepted, but there has not been any (visible) progress for some time. So there will be a better solution, just be patient. About my code: This is far from being ready for checkin. I just posted some code that works here, but it doesn't fit into django in its current state. Greetings, David Danier --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
