On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 14:33 -0700, Justin Fagnani wrote:
> I forgot to mention this as one of my ponies at djangocon, but I'd
> really love to have multi-column fields. I particularly need this for
> measurement and currency fields, which I think would be awesome to
> have built-in.
> 
> So is anyone working on #5929? I see an email from Malcolm in March[1]
> that mentions that he might have had some pieces of the puzzle coming
> with qs-rf. At first glance it certainly doesn't appear too hard,
> except that I'm not sure how much this issue interacts with #373. I
> think I see where the logical changes would go and I'd be willing to
> put the work in on this over the next couple of weeks.

I've got most of it done locally, but I need to port it forwards to
match recent changes on trunk (it's about 400 - 500 revisions behind at
the moment). I dropped in a more-or-less hack to make GenericRelations
in filters work before 1.0 because I couldn't get this finished in time.
That's just a temporary solution (well, it's part of the final solution,
but needs a little more thinking to make it truly portable).

It probably helps with the pieces David's finding hard in his latest
multi-col primary key stuff, but before I go forwards with generic
multicolumn stuff, I need to review David's patch and make sure we're
both heading in roughly the same direction. That's probably a couple of
days away at the moment, since I'm a bit loaded up right now, but if you
haven't seen anything in a week, ping me again.

Regards,
Malcolm



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to