Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > I've been thinking through, with a couple of different people, how we > can support extra lookup types on fields and so I'm going to reserve > judgement on this particular implementation until I have some thoughts > in order on the latter subject.
In my opinion this patch doesn't make any difference for any new architecture of lookup types because it doesn't change the current one. It just adds another item to a fixed list of supported lookup types and several conditions leaving them as uniform as they are. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
