On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd probably say that we bite the bullet and use 1.1 except then we > should do what one of the Spanish Marc's has suggested in a ticket > somewhere (could I be any less specific on the details, do you think?) > and make the main documentation link point to the 1.0 docs and put a > "development docs this way" sign up somewhere. > > Thoughts?
+1 to Marc's suggestion regarding the main documentation link being the v1.0 docs. I'm still coming to grips with Sphinx, but is there any reason that we can't just use 1.X or 1.SVN as a version number for the development version? That gets around the need to specify the exact version number, but keeps it reasonably obvious that it's a development version. Russ %-) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
