Right, I understand the need for absolute numbers, I just meant that we don't need to start rewriting new benchmarks if Jeremy still has the benchmark script.
Alex On Nov 16, 11:03 pm, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well, Jeremy Dunck was kind enough to do a benchmark against the old > > system:http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread... > > I knew about these. While these are great for establishing the > relative improvement offered by the new signals, they don't really > address the question of absolute performance. For an signal with no > listeners, the new signals may be 67% faster, but faster than what? > > I know this is a horribly nebulous question (like all benchmarking), > and it's completely dependent on the speed of your machine and a > million other factors. However, if we are going to start adding > signals to very common operations (like m2m and opening connections), > we need to know what sort of overhead we are adding in absolute terms. > > Yours, > Russ Magee %-) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
