On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 02:24 -0800, Vinay Sajip wrote: > > > On Nov 17, 1:13 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > My -1 is because of basically the same thing Jannis has pointed out (and > > as I mentioned in my comment). There's a big ticket with various > > proposals and at some point last year Adrian mentioned he had another > > idea and that led to a group discussion at PyCon this year which raised > > a bunch of issues to be resolved. I don't feel there's a great consensus > > about the approach yet. This isn't something that should be half-baked, > > so if there's still unresolved items with no buy-in from any maintainer > > (and I haven't seen that yet), then I'm not going to be in favour. > > > > I just don't think there's enough detail in your comments - maybe I'm > just being thick :-( You say "the same thing as Jannis has pointed > out" - which thing is that exactly, sorry if I'm being dense?
The InstalledAppsRevision wiki page. That was produced after the PyCon sprint. Since that involved a bunch of people, a number of them maintainers, I tend to view it as fairly canonical as to what is wanted in the feature. Regards, Malcolm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
