On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 01:40, Eric Holscher <[email protected]> wrote: > I have talked to James Tauber about ticket #3569 which is about adding > better support for Atom to the syndication feeds framework. > > I know a lot of people (myself included) use his atom.py[1] file > instead of Django's atom feed framework.
And myself, without the compatibility-layer. The API seems easier somehow. Less magic. > I think that including the new code in a place like > django.contrib.atom would also be an option, for in the future there > might be more support added for Atompub. Now that is an elegant solution. The old framework could then slowly be deprecated and new stuff could start out using the one, true^W^W... *cough*. Also, feeds feel a little to the side of the bread and butter "ORM and forms"-stuff and so suitable for contrib. What plans are there for more support for Atompub? I write news items directly in the admin these days. HM --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
