On Mar 24, 3:08 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[email protected]> wrote: > Seriously, if we documented everything that wasn't possible with Django, > the documentation would be a couple of million words long. There's > nothing that says select_related() does work with reverse relations and > if people are going to make assumptions, that's their problem.
My reasoning was: If function is named "select_related", it gets all related stuff... backward relations are as good as any relation to my knowledge, it should get them too. To not be confusing it should be named select_forward_relations() or something such, and if backward relations are implemented, then create select_backward_relations() and select_related that combines those two. I don't know whats common consensus what "select_related" term should contain, but I just thought it means like all related stuff. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
