I totally agree that returning an object is the way to go. I know a lot of other folks are busy getting the next release out, but after that, I am happy to submit a proposed patch. I think it should be straightforward to preserve the current api while still adding new functionality.
On Apr 18, 2009, at 4:55 AM, fas <mben...@gmail.com> wrote: You can take this idea further by not providing the name but the resolver object. This gives you much more flexibility. [...] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
