As an alternative, we could try FRAMEWORK for extra emphasis. Perhaps a bit janky, though.
-justin On May 8, 2009, at 9:24 AM, Marty Alchin <gulop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss > <jacob.kaplanm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> """ >> Discussion group for Django developers. This group is used for >> discussion of developing Django itself, not user questions; Please >> use >> django-users for issues regarding using the framework, questions for >> the Django user community, outreach, etc. >> """ >> >> If you've got any suggestions of ways to make that more clear -- >> other >> than renaming the list, which isn't going to happen -- I'd love to >> hear 'em. > > I'm not sure if it'll actually avoid confusion, but could we just do > away with the first sentence entirely? After all, even before reading > the description, they know it's a Google group called > django-developers. Does the first sentence actually add anything > useful? That would allow the description to lead off with the actual > purpose of the group, so hopefully it would do some good. > > As for Ned's suggestion of "core", I wonder if that would be better > suited in the description of what we develop. Maybe something like > "...discussion of developing the core Django framework..." perhaps? > > -Gul > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
