Graham Dumpleton wrote: > I was only commenting in relation to how Apache works and the > conjecture that: > >
Yep, I assumed so - just wanted to make sure that nobody read it in a more general way. > Take it as you will as being irrelevant to the main conversation about > Django itself, but am just clarifying what is reality for Apache in > relation to that sweeping statement about what happened back in the > """days when all web pages were a collection of static html files""". > For users, the original statement ( /foo, /foo/ and /foo/index.html usually being equivalent ) was correct. I think you're probably just looking at it from a different angle. As someone else pointed out, it's very likely moot at this point anyway. Cheers, Nick -- Nick Phillips / +64 3 479 4195 / nick.phill...@otago.ac.nz # these statements are my own, not those of the University of Otago --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
