On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Richard > Davies<[email protected]> wrote: >> > I'm a fan of having more if tags, but am not a fan of having if tags that > require me to remember all of the suffixes. Perhaps a smarter if tag in > general would be better...
A smarter "if" tag has already been proposed as a v1.2 feature, and I think there is some support for it. However, "smarter" doesn't mean "exposing everything that Python can do" - it just means clarifying the syntax for some of the simple cases. ==, < >, and "in" are possible candidates. "startswith" sounds a bit too much like "logic in the template" feature creep to me. Yours, Russ Magee %-) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
