On Sep 17, 4:04 pm, Russell Keith-Magee <freakboy3...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've seen several attempts to wrap Java loggers in a "nicer" > interface, and every one of them ended up hobbling some of the power > features of the logger. There is also the issue of our wrapper playing > nicely with the loggers already being used in the wild.
I should clarify - by "lightweight wrapper" I basically mean a pre- configured log setup and a standard place to import the logger from - and maybe a tiny bit of syntactic sugar if it will make the common case more palatable. I'm mostly just interested in making the logging module an encouraged technique within the Django world. It should definitely play nicely with any already-existant logging code. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
