Some features from wiki proposal page don't get their way to google spreadsheet (ex: 2 cache-related proposals) and they are not mentioned in the final features page neither in a list of accepted features nor in a list of rejected features. I understand that there are some valid reasons for that but, out of curiosity, what are their 'official' status?
On 23 окт, 22:29, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks -- > > Based on the votes and comments I've received for Django 1.2 I've > prepared a breakdown of features into high, medium, and low > priority:http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Version1.2Features. > > I've noted associated committers and, where I know 'em, lieutenants. > Please make corrections if needed. > > If you need clarification as to why a particular feature is classified > where it is, or if you want to see our comments, please check out the > master vote > spreadsheet:http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AtIlKMKDxMBpdGVPVXlTODVLeTBpN.... > I'm happy to clarify anything that's not clear, but please lets not > have an argument about "low" vs "medium" or whathaveyou. > > Remember: these are only guidlines. Anything complete by the feature > freeze deadline (December 22nd) is a candidate for inclusion. > > So: we've got sixty days to get new features in - let's go! > > Jacob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
