On Sunday 25 October 2009 07:22:27 Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > I'm keen to see a resolution to this problem. To that end, I'm > interested in hearing specific criticisms or concerns with the > current backend proposal. I'm also interested in any alternate > approaches to this problem.
I'm completely fine on this proposal. Apparently I voted '-0', I'm not sure precisely why as I didn't leave any specific comment, but I would change that to +0 now (I have no specific need for it myself, but can see that it's an important improvement for lots of people, and it can be implemented cleanly). I presume that the only built-in email backends would be the existing SMTP one, one for testing (which is just a code shuffle really), and a 'write to standard out' one for debugging (which is trivial and completely un-critical anyway), so this doesn't really add any maintenance burden to Django. Regards, Luke -- A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. -- Douglas Adams Luke Plant || http://lukeplant.me.uk/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
