On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Waldemar Kornewald <wkornew...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <ja...@jacobian.org> > wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Alex Gaynor <alex.gay...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> So here's an idea, of dubious quality ;) >> Okay, folks: at this point the discussion has pretty much descended >> into bikeshedding territory. I'm going to read through everything >> posted so far and try to post a summary and round-up to help us get >> refocused; gimme a few hours to pull that together and then let's try >> to reach towards a consensus. > I've started putting everything into a summary spreadsheet. Feel free > to change/extend it: > https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AnLqunL-SCJJdGhxSVZaQkNCcTlzM2d4OEc5dFRPUUE&hl=en
Some of the approaches also allow for easy grouping of similar views. For example I'm currently working on an ArchiveView with methods: * index(self, request) * details(self, request, year, month, day, id) * day(self, request, year, month, day) * week(...) * month(...) * year(...) So you only instantiate one object (telling it which templates to use, what month format you prefer etc.) and bind its methods to various URLs. -- Patryk Zawadzki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
