On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:30 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> I'd define
>> {% for templ in template_list %}
>> {% include templ %}
>> {% endfor %}
> as a special case, for which special command or pattern should exist.
>
> Should it be
> {% for templ in template_list %}
> {% try-include template %}
> {% endfor %}
> or the opposite to be called
> {% require template %} instead of include,
> or maybe this whole pattern should be written as
> {% include-first templ %}
>
> But in most cases {% include %} is used as "require", so in my
> opinion it should raise errors!
>
> I'd also consider a require-once pattern to fix common widget chrome
> problems (i.e. different parts of the page might include jquery in
> headers).
Either I'm completely missing the point you're trying to make, or
you've completely missed the point I was making.
Template rendering is a two step process:
1. Parse the template
2. Render the template.
The point I was trying to make is that at step 1, we *can't* know the
name of the subtemplate used in an {% include %}. This isn't a matter
for negotiation or something we are in a position to design -- it's
simply the way that the tag is implemented.
I don't see how changing the name of the include tag to "require" or
"try-include" changes anything, or how an alternate tag with those
names would behave differently.
Yours
Russ Magee %-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
