On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Ned Batchelder <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe it wouldn't be so bad to punt on invalidation?  The cached databases
> would only have to be rebuilt if the models changed or if the fixtures
> changed, right?  We have a similar situation now with migrations: you have
> to write one every time you change a model, and there's no automatic
> mechanism that kicks in to tell you to write one, you just have to know:
> "change a model, write a migration."  If that's working now, then what's
> wrong with, "change a model or a fixture, re-run the test database cacher."

The difference is, migrations can be merged.  Database cache is local
state.  No?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.

Reply via email to