On 18.05.2011, at 20:19, Jannis Leidel wrote: > On 13.05.2011, at 07:33, Paul McMillan wrote: > >> Baseconv is a clever bit of work. It should probably be using our full >> base64 charset. We could also shave some digits in the time-limited >> output there by subtracting from a more recent fixed value than the >> unix epoch, the way the password reset token code does. > > The TimeStampSigner requires the seconds to correct determine whether the > signature is still valid, so I'm not sure if that's a good idea. If you > have an idea to have both thing, I'd appreciate any help.
Wow, ironically, this should have read "correctly" and "things". Jannis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
