On 29/09/11 23:39, Alex Gaynor wrote: > When I was writing it, I suspect my objective was to move the minimal > amount as possible to make the caching valid. I've got no problem with > having them be attributes, rather than closures. The patch looks fine > to me, feel free to commit.
To keep optimal caching and other things simple, it is easier for some to be closure variables now rather than attributes. Cheers, Luke -- I teleported home one night With Ron and Sid and Meg, Ron stole Meggie's heart away And I got Sidney's leg (THHGTTG) Luke Plant || http://lukeplant.me.uk/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
