-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Anssi,
Thanks for your work on #17025 - sounds like an impressive improvement. On 10/09/2011 01:28 PM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > I really do not know how to move forward. I guess I am asking all you > what do you think should be done with the ORM. We could take a > completely opposite direction and make it a wrapper around SQLAlchemy > (I saw this mentioned somewhere some time ago). Or decide that the ORM > is just fine now, or that there are higher importance items. Before > continuing my hacking, it would be nice to know if there is support > for ORM refactoring. I am not sure the "wrapper around SQLAlchemy" idea is at all feasible, for any number of reasons; it's certainly not an idea that should hold up other improvements. I do think there are parts of the ORM that could really benefit from the kind of cleanup and refactoring you're talking about, so consider me in favor. I can't make specific promises about review, but I have #17025 high on my list to look at, and would make an effort to review any patches you work on in this area. Carl -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6TGvEACgkQ8W4rlRKtE2dphgCfa+u2GsqbNuQbZCHjgNkuwKre +JsAoICOuSAQ82lrE6oPNHmkDIrqKhSA =K6a2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
