-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Vinay,
On 12/05/2011 04:41 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote: [snip] > containing " IN ()", which the backend rejects as a syntax error]. I'm > running the full suite now, but I don't expect it to finish before the > end of the day :-( That sounds orders of magnitude slower than running the tests under Postgres here - and I haven't done any of the pg-config tweaking others have mentioned (not even turning fsync off). Which leads me to think that either there is some particularly unusual Postgres slowness on your machine, or there's a major performance regression with the 3.x port and Postgres (which, if it's that significant, would block merging the port). Maybe if you run the tests in 2.x under Postgres, with trunk instead of the 3.x-port, you could observe the comparative speed on your same machine? Carl -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7c4AwACgkQ8W4rlRKtE2chPQCeNPuFvnqgAjDTlvNwPZmQArNN 5EYAoLRvkznDey6Y9fQ7lVwhrLGRq9u7 =BUc4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
