> > 2. I think your proposal is a bit too big. I'd general prefer to see a > less ambitious proposal with a high probability of success over a high > risk/high reward. I'd like to see you drop the "django-updates" part > of the proposal, and focus on validation and django-secure. If you end > up with extra time, you can always use it to write more checks.
Jacob, as you said, I deleted django-updates part, but I ended with a proposal taking only 9 weeks. Did you mean also scheduling more than 6 weeks for the first part of the proposal (writing the new framework) and "stretching" the schedule to 12 weeks? I agree that 6 weeks for writing the framework is slightly too few, but on the other side we have to send evaluations after first six weeks, so I think it's a good idea to have something that works done. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
