Hi Anssi, On 05/08/2013 03:31 PM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > It would be really nice to be able to use same syntax for running a > single Django's testcase at least for a while. I expect that there > will be problems if inspecting how a given test case behaves in older > versions compared to HEAD. Also, bisecting over the test case renaming > boundary will be really ugly. I don't believe end users will have too > much problems with this, but bug hunting and development in Django > itself will be a bit more tedious to do.
I don't think this is enough of a problem to warrant more code to try to work around it. If you're bisecting, at worst this means having two commands in your shell history instead of one and hopping up to the right one for each bisect step. I think this is a minor irritation that will fade away soon enough. Most of our test apps are small/fast enough that you could just run the whole app when bisecting instead of an individual TestCase, making this a non-issue (since Django's test apps are top-level on sys.path, the command to run a single app in Django's test suite is the same with the new runner as with the old: "python runtests.py app_name"). Carl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
