Okay, then I'm in favor of moving it to built-in tags as Aymeric suggested.
On Friday, July 11, 2014 6:57:51 PM UTC-4, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Daniele Procida <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014, Tim Graham <[email protected] <javascript:>> >> wrote: >> >> >It provides the lorem template tag. The functionality has not changed in >> 7 >> >years and it has 20 commits in its history which are mostly maintenance >> >oriented (pep8, adding app loading compatibility). >> >> As long as it's not getting in anyone's way, and is not imposing a >> maintenance burden, I would simply leave it alone as much as possible. >> >> There's bound to be someone who loves it dearly and uses it regularly. >> Let's not spoil their day! >> > > +1 to this. > > We needed to remove contrib.markup because it was becoming a maintenance > burden because flaws in downstream libraries were opening flaws in Django > core. *That* is a good reason to excise code; a vestigial module that isn't > getting in anyone's way might as well stay where it is. > > Russ %-) > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/f5392417-4809-405a-9b55-cbfcf22e5e47%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
