On Monday 14 July 2014 20:07:16 Collin Anderson wrote: > Hi All, > > I just saw #23015 come through (1.9 -> 2.0 not an earth-shattering > release). I think it's a little ridiculous that decimal point doesn't > really mean anything. > > I'm wondering if it would make sense, after 2.0, to follow Chrome, Firefox, > and semantic versioning (http://semver.org/), and simply go with 3.0, 4.0, > etc. in the future. The Patch/Micro versions would be 2.0.2, 3.0.1, etc. > There would never be a 2.1.0 unless we somehow had nothing to remove on the > deprecation timeline, which has never happened before. > FWIW, I always thought the version after 1.9, if it isn't earth-shattering, should be 1.10. Reasons to break things will pop up in due time (e.g. the death of python 2 in 2019).
Shai. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/201407142014.51685.shai%40platonix.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
