I'm +1 for this, for the same reasons; I have a monkey patch for my 
selenium tests which does the same thing as this PR.

On Saturday, 2 August 2014 18:20:18 UTC-6, Matthew Somerville wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have created a branch at 
> https://github.com/dracos/django/compare/pipe-cleaning that builds upon a 
> previous patch posted to this list and outputs "Broken pipe" instead of a 
> traceback for such an error. As the history below shows, practically 
> speaking all reports of broken pipe tracebacks in the log are due to the 
> browser cutting off output, and are not helpful to be shown as a full 
> traceback. I get them frequently (e.g. hit refresh before your previous 
> page has finished loading to sometimes get it), and find them annoying.
>
> I am posting here because ticket #4444 - 
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/4444 - is marked wontfix. I am not 
> "imagei" on that ticket, I just came across the ticket recently whilst 
> trying to work out why my Selenium tests on Travis were failing with broken 
> pipes when they were fine last week - 
> https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/2610 (some change to 
> underlying Travis, I assume). Ticket #4444 was opened in May 2007, and 
> marked wontfix in September 2007 saying "The best we could is to have a 
> more explicit error message." In 2008 someone provided a patch to make it 
> a logged error message rather than spew a scary traceback, there was a +1 
> and a "leave as-is", then silence. There was a brief reopening of the 
> thread in 2012 by two people who also found the broken pipe tracebacks 
> tedious, then nothing further since then. The thread (2008 and 2012) can be 
> found at 
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/django-developers/W1Nns9k40EQ
>
> (The 'python manage.py runserver --help' is a little bit confusing because 
> it has a --traceback argument and yet you still get a traceback - you have 
> to have read the default options section of the django-admin.py 
> documentation to know that only makes a difference to CommandError, not any 
> other type of error. My branch also adds "CommandError" to the help output 
> of --traceback.)
>
> The 2008 patch doesn't really work any more, but I think I've made the 
> spirit of the same thing on the current Django code. I hope this can be 
> considered for inclusion, as I think it tidies up a common issue with 
> runserver output that will especially confuse people new to Django. Do let 
> me know if I've gone about fixing it in the wrong way, or if I should do 
> something differently. In my testing it certainly makes my runserver logs 
> nicer to follow :)
>
> ATB,
> Matthew
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/380d3832-dcf3-4104-85c2-ce735e72c69d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to