It's not similar. This implements the "decorator" pattern. Something that I've been proposing years ago.
Le mercredi 3 septembre 2014 18:24:17 UTC+2, Ian a écrit : > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Sam Willis <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > > Although I have implemented this with the 'use' word, there may be a > better > > word. I considered 'embed' but thought 'use' was a little cleaner > > Since it's so similar to 'include', is there a reason not to just add > the new functionality to the existing tag? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/39ea5fd1-f9c0-4e58-9b5c-8ac2caf55c35%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
