On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 20:31 +0200, Aymeric Augustin wrote: > Feedback is welcome, especially on sections I've described as "done" in the > update.
The FAQ section says that template context processors isn't going to be supported for context processors. The context processors return a dictionary to be added to the context, so there is nothing template language specific in this definition. What is the rationale of dropping context processors out of the proposal? It seems supplying different template engines with different data isn't going to work well for any project in which one wants to replace DTL templates. - Anssi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/1413550163.21107.146.camel%40TTY32. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
