On 6 déc. 2014, at 10:05, Carl Meyer <[email protected]> wrote: > As the DEP notes, our backwards-compatibility policy already includes a > longstanding carve-out for anything documented within the "internals" > section of the docs. We haven't made much use of this for documenting > actual internal APIs (most of that section of the docs is about > contribution process), but we could.
Like Carl, I believe “internal” is an established concept that fits our needs better than “experimental”. To me “experimental” sounds much like an ill-defined gray zone between private and public. -- Aymeric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/A3D3D45A-19CE-44D4-82DA-84AA45EDA586%40polytechnique.org. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
