On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Fabio Caritas Barrionuevo da Luz < bna...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Some ideas. (which still require approval of the core developers): > > > * Improve database backend base API and related features(including > introspection feature used by inspectdb), so that it is less complicated to > add in the future support the specific features of some backends. eg > multiple database schemas (common used in Oracle and PostgreSQL) and/or > Oracle synonym tables > A project like this is more likely to get traction if you're targeting a specific feature. Instead of targeting a generic cleanup for a theoretical feature, you're more likely to find acceptance for implementing a *specific* feature that is database specific - like, for example, multiple schema support. > * port Django i18n and i10 and related translation features to use Babel: > http://babel.pocoo.org/ > As a concept, I suspect this one would definitely be of interest. However, it would also be a very *big* project, and one where you can't really deliver small parts, so it's extremely ambitious for the GSoC timeframe. I'm not ruling it out, but it would require a very special student, and a very willing mentor. Yours Russ Magee %-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAJxq849ha1Bn0XzDe06d4yfa-jTf6d3skyYv170mxm9B%3Dwu4pw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
