What was the approach Loic has planned? As Marten had an implementation here [1] just without the locking functionality. Is all the work related to virtual fields done yet?
[1] https://github.com/knbk/django/commit/7ac5b58587ea2a153766d1601965734731609cdf On Jul 24, 2015 7:44 PM, "Tim Graham" <timogra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Loic indicated the latest approach isn't ideal and said he might work on > the issue. > > https://github.com/django/django/pull/4184 > > On Friday, July 24, 2015 at 6:59:56 PM UTC-4, Aron Podrigal wrote: >> >> Bumping up on this again, what are the plans for moving this ahead. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CANJp-yjSpv5kXx38-pwvbg%2BohNZR0-76gyO3shitATqmDrswaQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
