Sorry did read the commit code now and the new *method_decorator* seems to solve most of the problem
On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 11:21:36 AM UTC, Fabrizio Messina wrote: > > Hello I would like to ask why the class based views documentation seems so > much ugly. Some developers probably are scared by these just because the > decoration is ugly, the documentation offers three ways: > > Decorate the *Klass().dispach()* method of the class, wrapping the > decorators in another decorator: > > @method_decorator(decorator_1) > def dispatch(request, *args, **kwargs): > pass > > Wrapping the *Klass.as_view()* resulting in an arguably ugly > > *:* > > > *decorator_1( decorator_2( .. ( .. decorator_n( Klass.as_view() ) .. ) .. > ))*In my opinion this is an issue because decoration is actually cool and the > alternative is to use the much more dreadful Multiple Inheritance, that is > the documented third way. > > > I personally use reduce syntax: > > view = reduce(lambda x, f: f(x), (decorator_1, decorator_2, .., > decorator_n), Klass.as_view()) > > Probably there are better ways but still to me it seems to me that > something like this is more readable, easier to modify and less scary. To > me it has the pro that one could easily wrap common used decorators in a > single iterable. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/e479adea-e000-457e-8286-4adceb95a9b5%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
