On 28 Aug 2016, at 20:46, Ivan Sevastoyanov <ivan.sevastoya...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you consider using SonarQube (or something similar) for code quality > analysis? Hello Ivan, Generally speaking, there isn’t a lot of demand for code changes with no impact on functionality, especially as first time contributions. Such patches are tedious to review compared to the value they add. In practice it can be faster for a committer to redo the job that to check that it was done correctly. The coding style tends to improve as a side effect of making other changes in an area. If SonarQube goes beyond traditional code quality guidelines, for example if it does static analysis and can find bugs with reasonable accuracy, that would be more interesting. In that case you’ll have to tell us a bit more about the kind of results you expect. Many people (including myself) have never heard of SonarQube before and aren’t familiar with what it can do. I hope this helps, -- Aymeric. PS: could you pick a better word than “guys” to address people on this mailing list? Even though “guys” can include people regardless of gender in some cultures, originally “guy” is a synonym for “man”, and you don’t want to imply that you’re only talking to men. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/AF09D0DA-C80C-4589-AAA1-C2208141B4DF%40polytechnique.org. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
