I'm not sure offhand. Could you provide a link to the issue so we could look at the details?
On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 1:45:48 PM UTC-5, Andrew Godwin wrote: > > An interesting bug has turned up in Channels where someone is trying to > remove a session using .flush(), but our decorator sees that it's been > modified and then re-saves it, thinking it needs to persist data. > > What are people's opinions on changing flush() to also set modified=False > on sessions? Is there a bad side-effect of this I haven't considered? > > Andrew > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/2ae6fbc5-171f-4647-9604-29fc6833ee0a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
